Home

New Danish Security and Intelligence Service Campaign to Create Dialogue Among Researchers

: 30.01.2024

How do we best protect Danish research against espionage? A new campaign from the Danish Security and Intelligence Service will focus on this.

New Danish Security and Intelligence Service Campaign to Create Dialogue Among Researchers

: 30.01.2024

How do we best protect Danish research against espionage? A new campaign from the Danish Security and Intelligence Service will focus on this.

Danish research and innovation is under pressure from the significant and ongoing interest that foreign, non-like-minded states show in Danish knowledge, technology and know-how. These developments place new, high demands on universities' ability to handle security challenges of great importance to national security.

- In Denmark, we must exploit the full potential of our knowledge and innovation, but at the same time we need to consider security to a much greater extent – and preferably from the very beginning, says Anders Henriksen, Head of Counterintelligence, Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET).

Increased awareness and dialogue

In dialogue with AAU and the other universities, PET has identified a need for a targeted effort towards academic staff to initiate a dialogue about the knowledge environments' responsibility, security awareness and opportunities for action.

The purpose of the campaign is to increase the target group's awareness of the espionage threat and the threat from other illegal or unwanted knowledge transfer, as well as to raise awareness of the dilemmas researchers experience due to their key role in preventing this threat.

- At PET, we are very aware that a number of Danish research institutions and companies face a major task and are central to ensuring Denmark's security. The institutions themselves must ultimately weigh the need for security against other considerations, such as freedom of research or financial considerations. PET is of course happy to assist with advice if necessary, says Karen Lund Petersen, Head of PET's Centre for Innovation and Knowledge Security.

The primary target group for the campaign is researchers at Danish universities working in technology areas such as energy, biotech, quantum, space, robotics and defence.

The campaign will be presented at the country's universities, with posters in the urban space and on a new part of PET's website  www.pet.dk/sikkerforskning.

What is PET doing?

In recent years, PET has increased its efforts in this area including establishing the Centre for Innovation and Knowledge Security, tasked with protecting Denmark's interests and national security by increasing resilience against espionage and other unwanted knowledge transfer in Danish research institutions and companies.

- At PET, we are experiencing a significant increase in the need for advice when Danish research institutions and research-intensive companies have to navigate the new security policy reality. We advise research institutions on a daily basis on the threat from countries like Russia and China, says Karen Lund Petersen.

This text is based on a press release from the Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET). Translated by LeeAnn Iovanni, AAU Communication and Public Affairs.

Baggrund

  • In order to strengthen the security of Danish knowledge institutions, the Ministry of Higher Education and Science, in conjunction with the universities, developed a number of recommendations (the URIS guidelines) in 2022 with a view "to better support Danish educational and research institutions in their international collaborations for the benefit of Danish research and competitiveness and without compromising Denmark's security." (URIS 2022, p. 5)
  • Based on the URIS Guidelines, PET has launched a special effort to strengthen security in Danish innovation and research. In short, the effort is about protecting the research and innovation necessary to ensure that future generations of Danes can also live in freedom and prosperity.
  • Danish universities and companies must become more competent – in collaboration with security authorities – to handle the security threats posed by the global battle for knowledge.
  • Although PET provides intelligence-based advice on the threat, it is ultimately the universities that must make decisions about possible hires and collaborations. It is still the individual researcher who handles the daily research collaborations and defines the research areas. In other words, the research environments must find the balance between freedom of research and national security.
  • PET's campaign will support the necessary dialogue on how best to strike the balance between freedom of research and national security.